Cheque bounce & NI Act
Section 138 practice end to end: notice, complaint, presumptions and recovery.
Questions advocates ask about Cheque bounce & NI Act
A dishonoured cheque is an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act only if a chain of time limits is kept: the cheque presented in time, a written demand within 30 days of learning it bounced, 15 days for the drawer to pay, and a complaint within a month after that. Most cases are lost on the dates, not on the merits.
When does a bounced cheque become a criminal offence?
When a cheque drawn to discharge, wholly or partly, a legally enforceable debt or liability is returned unpaid because of insufficient funds or because it exceeds the amount arranged with the bank, and the drawer then fails to pay within 15 days of receiving a demand notice. The punishment is imprisonment up to two years, or a fine up to twice the cheque amount, or both.
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, s. 138
What are the deadlines?
The cheque must be presented to the bank within three months of its date or within its validity, whichever is earlier. The payee must send the written demand within 30 days of receiving information from the bank that the cheque was dishonoured. The drawer then has 15 days from receiving the notice to pay. The complaint must be filed within one month from the date the cause of action arises, that is, after those 15 days end; the court may condone a delay for sufficient cause.
NI Act s. 138 proviso (a), (b), (c); NI Act s. 142(1)(b)
Which court can hear the complaint?
Since the 2015 amendment, jurisdiction follows the payee's bank. Where the cheque was delivered for collection through an account, the complaint is filed in the court within whose area the branch where the payee or holder in due course maintains that account is situated. The amendment was made after the Supreme Court had tied jurisdiction to the drawee bank's branch.
NI Act s. 142(2); Negotiable Instruments (Amendment) Act, 2015
Can the drawer be made to pay something before the trial ends?
Yes, in two ways. The trial court may order the drawer to pay interim compensation of up to 20% of the cheque amount, and the appellate court may order the appellant drawer to deposit a minimum of 20% of the fine or compensation while the appeal is pending. Both were added by the 2018 amendment.
NI Act s. 143A (interim compensation); NI Act s. 148 (deposit on appeal); Surinder Singh Deswal v. Virender Gandhi, (2019) 11 SCC 341
Does the case end if the drawer pays?
The offence can be compounded, which ends the case, and payment of the cheque amount with the costs the court directs is the usual basis for it. The Supreme Court has issued guidelines on the costs payable when compounding is sought at different stages.
NI Act s. 147; Damodar S. Prabhu v. Sayed Babalal H., (2010) 5 SCC 663
Prepared by The EduLaw Editorial Team on 2 November 2026. It has not yet been reviewed by a named advocate. Educational content, not legal advice; check the current text of each provision before relying on it.
Judgments and analysis
- How Senior Advocates Handle a Cheque Bounce Case | Complete S.138 NI Act Playbook | EduLaw
- Accused Not Appearing in Section 138 Cases? What Senior Advocates Do | Advocate Playbook 062
- Cheque Bounce Notice Received by Family Member Is Valid Service — Supreme Court Settles Section 138 NI Act Debate | Sainaba v. State of Kerala Full Case Analysis
- What Makes a Cheque Bounce Case Actually Hold Up in Court? | EduLaw
- How Senior Advocates Win a Cheque Bounce Case Before Filing | EduLaw Advocate Playbook 087
- Signature Admitted, Defence Denied: Supreme Court Reinforces Cheque Bounce Presumption Under NI Act
- No Company, No Case: Supreme Court Rules Section 319 CrPC Cannot Rescue a Defective Cheque Bounce Complaint
- Acquittal in Cheque Bounce Case Does Not Bar Civil Recovery Suit – Kerala HC Landmark Ruling
- Accused Not Appearing in Section 138 Cases? What Senior Advocates Do | Advocate Playbook 062
- Supreme Court Quashes Cheque Bounce Conviction After Jail Settlement Section 138 NI Act Compounding at Post-Sentence Stage
- Material Alteration of Cheque Destroys Section 138 NI Act Conviction | Rajasab v. Hulagappa Supreme Court 2026
- Part Payment Before Cheque Bounce? Delhi HC Rules Section 138 NI Act Notice Valid If Balance Clearly Explained
- No ITR Filing? Your Cheque Bounce Case Under Section 138 NI Act Still Survives | Punjab & Haryana HC Ruling
- Gujarat High Court Rules Section 138 NI Act Complainant Is a 'Victim' Transfers Acquittal Appeal to Sessions Court
- Section 138 NI Act Cheque Bounce Case Analysis | EduLaw Premium Legal Guide
- Supreme Court Rules Multiple Cheque Bounce Complaints Maintainable for Same Transaction Section 138 NI Act Landmark 2026 Ruling
- Supreme Court Quashes Cheque Bounce Conviction After Settlement Section 138 NI Act Can Be Compounded Even Post-Imprisonment 2026
Ready-to-file drafts
2,100+ editable Indian legal drafts across 40+ practice areas — applications, petitions, notices, replies and agreements. See the drafts bundle.
Notes and Playbooks
- The Advocate's Playbook: Cheque Bounce Cases (The Section 138 NI Act Practice Manual) — Fully Audited for BNSS & BSA 2026 — ₹99
- The EduLaw Negotiable Instruments Act notes along with Landmark Judgements — ₹199
Bundles
- Cheque Bounce Recovery & Section 138 Practice Bundle — ₹599
- The Complete 19-Book Advocate Playbook Bundle — ₹1699
- The Ultimate Advocate Playbook (22 Books) + 2100 Legal Drafts — ₹1999