The Ayodhya Treasury Probe: Donation Irregularities, Public Faith & Institutional Accountability | EduLaw
EduLaw EditorialEduLaw : Beyond the FilesAn evidence-based, legally grounded explainer on the Ayodhya Ram Mandir donation controversy, the SIT probe, the FIR against eight people, the silver/IBJA question and the law on temple trust accountability. Updated 25 June 2026.
E EduLaw Legal Editorial Beyond the Headlines 010 Public Accountability Explainer The Ayodhya Treasury Probe Inside the donation controversy, the SIT inquiry and the legal questions around public faith and financial accountability. By EduLaw Editorial Updated: 25 June 2026 ~22 min read Evidence-based · Source-supported This explainer follows a single, simple discipline: separate what is confirmed from what is merely alleged. A Special Investigation Team is at work, an FIR has been filed, and political voices are loud on every side. None of that establishes guilt. What follows is a calm, source-supported account of how the controversy unfolded, what the law actually says, and why the episode matters for every institution in India that collects money in the name of faith. A note on language Throughout this piece, an allegation is a claim that has not been proven. A confirmed fact is something stated on the record by an official body or multiple credible outlets. An FIR records an accusation so an investigation can begin — it is not a verdict. Nobody named here has been convicted of anything. 01 — The Story in 10 Points Executive Summary The essentials, each tagged by evidentiary status. Allegations that donations at the Ayodhya Ram Mandir were misappropriated surfaced publicly from 7 June 2026 , first raised by former UP minister Pawan Pandey and amplified by SP chief Akhilesh Yadav. Confirmed (that claims were made) On 13 June 2026 , the Uttar Pradesh government constituted a three-member SIT — at the written request of the Trust itself. Confirmed The SIT visited the temple complex from 15 June, conducted roughly 60 hours of inquiry over six days , and questioned over 150 people. Confirmed The SIT's preliminary report (submitted 21–23 June) flagged systemic weaknesses : lapses in the double-lock cash protocol, weak transport-to-bank controls, and gaps in handling of gold/silver. Under Investigation About ₹2 crore in cash and some gold were recovered from persons linked to the counting process; exact quantities not officially disclosed. Confirmed (recovery) On 25 June 2026 , the Trust filed an FIR naming eight people (mostly cash-counting staff) under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita; six were detained. Confirmed The FIR does not name senior trustees Champat Rai or Anil Mishra. Confirmed A widely cited "₹200 crore" figure is a political/media estimate , not an SIT finding. Early specific claims ranged from ₹5–7.5 crore. Alleged / Unverified The 60 kg silver question rests on donor receipts shown to the media; a documented mismatch against temple inventory has not been officially confirmed. Awaiting Verification Claims of deleted CCTV footage and "skimmed" donation entries come from purported former employees; not yet officially confirmed or ruled out. Alleged The 14 questions this blog answers What triggered the probe · Who ordered it · What the SIT is investigating · The cash/gold/silver allegations · The ₹200 crore figure · The 60 kg silver issue · The whistleblower claims · The CCTV/records question · What happened today · What the Trust says · What the government says · The legal offences that may arise · What happens next · Why it matters for temple governance. 02 — Day 1 to Today The Timeline Tap any entry to expand the detail, source and status. The timeline runs from the first public allegation to the FIR filed today. 03 — Plain Language What Actually Happened? The Ram Mandir receives offerings from lakhs of devotees — cash dropped into donation boxes, plus gold, silver and jewellery handed over at the shrine. The Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teerth Kshetra Trust, formed on 5 February 2020 after the Supreme Court's 2019 verdict, manages these funds. [2] In early June 2026, voices in Ayodhya — beginning with a former state minister and soon joined by opposition politicians and people describing themselves as former temple employees — alleged that some of this money and some valuables had gone missing or been "skimmed" during counting. The Trust initially said its routine audits with State Bank of India staff had found "nothing noteworthy." [3] As the claims multiplied, the Trust itself asked the UP government for a formal inquiry. The government set up an SIT. The SIT examined records, questioned scores of people, recovered some cash and gold, and reported systemic weaknesses in how donations were handled. On 25 June, the Trust filed an FIR against eight people. That is the confirmed skeleton. Everything beyond it — how much, who knew, whether records were destroyed, whether senior figures bear responsibility — is precisely what the investigation must now establish. What we know An SIT was constituted on 13 June at the Trust's request. An FIR naming eight people was filed on 25 June; six detained. Some cash (~₹2 cr) and gold were recovered. A 2020 private audit had warned of weak systems. What we do not know yet The actual sum, if any, that is unaccounted for. Whether CCTV footage was deleted. Whether any senior office-bearer is culpable. Whether the 60 kg silver is genuinely "missing." 04 — How the Money Moves The Donation System, Explained Understanding where things could go wrong requires understanding the normal journey of a rupee from a devotee's hand to a bank ledger. Tap each step. STEP 1 Donation Boxes STEP 2 Counting Centre STEP 3 Cash Counters STEP 4 Records & Receipts STEP 5 Banking Channel STEP 6 Trust Accounts STEP 7 Audit & Oversight The temple complex has roughly 35 donation boxes (golak), opened twice daily. This is the first point of cash collection — and the point where intake is hardest to verify against footfall. 05 — The Alleged Money Trail Where the Gaps Could Be This diagram maps the donation chain against the alleged weak points. The arrows are about possibility, not proof. Cash ₹812 lakh/day at peak; questions raised over why box totals stayed under ₹100 cr despite Mahakumbh footfall. [4] Gold Offered at shrine; gold recovered from a counting-staff residence on 13 June (quantity undisclosed). [4] Silver Donor receipts cited for ~60 kg; alleged not visible in records — under examination. [5] Physical inventory No systematic stock register for in-kind offerings, per 2020 audit. [2] Digital records Allegation of "skimmed" entries (e.g., ₹35 lakh shown as ₹20 lakh) — unverified whistleblower claim. [6] Bank deposit Double-lock transport protocol reportedly not consistently followed. [7] The core question for investigators: at which link — collection, transit, counting, recording, or deposit — did value leave the chain, if it did at all? Recovery of cash and gold from counting-linked individuals points investigators toward the counting stage, but the full picture is not established. 06 — The Silver Question The 60 kg Silver / IBJA Issue One strand of the controversy concerns silver offered by the Indian Bullion and Jewellers Association (IBJA) and individual donors. Here is what is on the record and what is not. Alleged Who & what Anurag Rastogi, described as IBJA North India head, told Aaj Tak / The Lallantop that silver (he cited a cumulative ~60 kg, including 39.26 kg around the 2020 Bhoomi Pujan, plus silver items and bricks, and a 3 kg family lamp) was donated. [5] Pending verification Do receipts exist? Rastogi said he displayed donation receipts to the media. A separate donor, Anil Vishwakarma, said he gave a ~3 kg silver garland and silver paduka in 2025 but had not received a receipt. [5] Under investigation The alleged mismatch The claim is that these items were "nowhere to be found." Whether temple inventory actually records them — and whether any item is genuinely missing — is what the SIT is examining. No official confirmation What remains unproven There is no official finding confirming a documented inventory shortfall of 60 kg silver. Donor recollection and receipts are evidence to be tested, not a conclusion. Read this carefully A donor having a receipt proves a donation was made . It does not, by itself, prove the item was stolen — it could be in storage, recorded under a different head, or used in temple décor. Equally, the Trust has not produced a public inventory matching these donations. Both gaps are exactly why an audit and the SIT exist. 07 — Claims & Security Gaps Whistleblower Claims and the CCTV Question Several individuals have made public claims. We report them as claims, not findings, and note the verification status of each. Claim made by What was alleged Status of verification Pawan Pandey (ex-minister, SP) ₹5–7.5 cr "stolen" from boxes; "all CCTV footage deleted"; valuables including silver bricks missing. [1][8] Alleged — political source; figure & deletion not officially confirmed. Mahipal Singh (claims to be ex-accounts in-charge) Box held ₹35 lakh but books showed ₹20 lakh; said he flagged it and was removed. [8] Awaiting verification — surfaced via viral video; not independently confirmed. Dinanath Verma (retired engineer) Alleged a senior trust official sought ~40% commission on works; alleged inflated bills; said he was threatened. [9] Alleged — relates to construction, not donations; under scrutiny. Anurag Rastogi (IBJA, donor) ~60 kg silver donated, not visible later; produced receipts. [5] Awaiting verification — donor account; inventory match unconfirmed. Reported devotees Receipts pending for months; specific gold/silver offerings unaccounted. [5] Alleged — individual accounts; aggregate impact unestablished. The CCTV footage claim The most serious allegation — that seven to eight months of CCTV footage was deleted , and the broader claim by Pawan Pandey that "all CCTV footage" was erased — is repeated widely but has not been officially confirmed. If destruction of footage is established, it engages the law on tampering with / destroying evidence. If footage in fact exists and was used to identify suspects, the opposite is true. Notably, the 25 June FIR reportedly relies in part on CCTV footage to identify the accused [10] — which sits in tension with the blanket "everything deleted" claim and must be reconciled by investigators. 08 — Latest Verified Development What Happened Today 25 June 2026 — FIR filed; six detained. The Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teerth Kshetra Trust, through its member Krishna Mohan, lodged an FIR at an Ayodhya police station against eight named people , with further unidentified accused, acting on the SIT's preliminary report and a UP government direction for strict action. Six people were detained for questioning, including counting-staff members Luv Kush Mishra and Anukalp/Anukul Mishra. [10] Charges: The FIR invokes provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), reportedly including Sections 306, 316(5), 317(4), 317(5) and 3(5). Investigators reportedly relied on CCTV footage and material gathered during the preliminary probe. [10] Not named: The FIR does not name senior trustees Champat Rai or Anil Mishra. Sources indicate the wider investigation continues. Confirmed The eight named in reporting: Ramashankar "Tinnu" Yadav, Anukalp Mishra, Avinash Shukla, Karunesh Pandey, Lav Kush Mishra, Rama Shankar Mishra, Subhash Srivastava (one further name was not consistently reported). [10] An FIR is the start of a criminal process, not its conclusion. 09 — The Law Legal Analysis Indian criminal law was recodified in 2024: the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS) replaced the Indian Penal Code for offences from 1 July 2024. Because the alleged conduct here spans that transition, both old IPC and new BNS provisions are referenced below by analysts. Listing a provision is not an accusation — it only shows what could apply if specific facts are proven. What may apply Criminal breach of trust BNS s.316 / IPC s.405–409 If a person entrusted with property (donations) dishonestly misappropriates it. Aggravated where done by a clerk/servant or person in a fiduciary capacity. Theft BNS s.303 / IPC s.378–379 Dishonestly taking movable property (cash, valuables) out of someone's possession without consent. Cheating BNS s.318 / IPC s.415–420 Where deception induces wrongful loss — relevant if donations were diverted through fraudulent means. Forgery / false accounts BNS s.336–340 / IPC s.463, 477A Falsifying ledgers or "skimming" recorded amounts (the alleged ₹35 lakh-as-₹20 lakh entry) could engage falsification of accounts. Destruction of evidence BNS s.238 / IPC s.201 Causing disappearance of evidence (e.g., CCTV) to screen offenders — only if deletion is proven and intent established. Criminal conspiracy BNS s.61 / IPC s.120A–B If two or more agreed to commit the offences — relevant given multiple accused. What cannot be assumed yet Prevention of Corruption Act Conditional Applies only if a public servant is involved. Trust office-bearers are generally not public servants merely by managing a religious trust; this would need a specific legal basis. Not to be assumed. Prevention of Money Laundering Act Conditional Requires a scheduled (predicate) offence generating proceeds of crime that are then laundered. None of this is established; invoking PMLA now would be premature. Trust law & fiduciary duties Beyond crime, the Trust operates under trust-law and charitable-governance principles: trustees owe fiduciary duties of care, loyalty and accountability for trust property, must keep proper accounts, and can face removal or surcharge for breach. Failure to maintain records or implement controls — as the 2020 audit warned — is itself a governance failure, even where no crime is proven. [2] What investigators must prove Quantum: a measurable shortfall between donations received and donations banked/recorded. Dishonest intent: that any shortfall resulted from dishonesty, not mere sloppiness. Attribution: linking specific acts to specific people through a clean evidence chain. Tampering, if alleged: that records/footage were destroyed and that this was deliberate. Chain of custody: that recovered cash/gold is traceable to temple donations. 10 — Why It Matters Institutional Accountability Whatever the SIT concludes, the episode exposes a structural truth: an institution receiving an estimated ₹3,500 crore in cash alone since 2020 [2] needs controls proportionate to that scale. The 2020 private audit said precisely this — and recommended an SOP, dual checks, a stock register for in-kind offerings, periodic bank reconciliation and proper IT controls. Those recommendations were reportedly not implemented. [2] Transparent accounting Published, audited financials so donors can see intake vs. deployment. Independent audit External auditors, not just internal/bank reviews; findings acted upon. Inventory control A stock register for every gold/silver/jewellery offering, with receipts. CCTV retention A written retention policy; no "auto-delete" gaps at sensitive points. Dual custody Two-person, double-lock control over cash from box to bank. Bank reconciliation Routine matching of counted totals against deposits. Public disclosure Regular, accessible reporting of donations and use. Governance checks Defined roles, a professional CEO/administration, no "verbal order" decisions. 11 — The Wider Pattern Religion, Money and Fraud in India The Ayodhya episode is not isolated. Across faiths, institutions handling devotional money have faced irregularity, mismanagement or fraud. The cases below are verified public matters — included to show a systemic governance pattern , not to equate them or imply guilt in the ongoing Ayodhya probe. Institution State Year(s) Nature Status Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams ("silk dupatta" procurement) Andhra Pradesh 2024–26 Alleged procurement fraud — polyester passed off as silk ACB probe [11] Sri Jagannath Temple — Ratna Bhandar keys Odisha 2018→ Treasury keys "missing"; inventory delayed for decades Inventory ordered; report process [12] Sree Padmanabhaswamy Temple Kerala 2011–21 Administration & accountability; SC ordered 25-yr audit Audit directed by Supreme Court [13] Shri Saibaba Sansthan Trust — fake online donations Maharashtra 2021 Fraudsters impersonating trust to solicit donations Public warning; complaints [14] Fake "Ram Janmabhoomi Trust" donation website UP / Delhi 2021 Fake website duped donors of lakhs 5 arrested by UP Police [15] Note: These span temples and trusts of different faiths; comparable verified, fully-adjudicated mosque/waqf and church fund-fraud cases vary widely in documentation, so only well-sourced matters are listed. Viral, unverified claims are deliberately excluded. Reported religious-institution money cases, by state Illustrative intensity based on the verified cases above (count of distinct matters referenced). Not a comprehensive national census. Lower Moderate Higher Figures cited in the Ayodhya matter (₹ crore) These are claimed or recovered figures at different stages — not a single verified loss. The "₹200 cr" bar is a political/media estimate. Sources: NIE, Newsgram, Rediff, India TV. Recovery (~₹2 cr) is officially reported; loss figures are unverified allegations. Types of irregularity alleged across religious institutions Indicative distribution across the verified comparative cases and the Ayodhya allegations; for illustration of category mix, not a statistical survey. 12 — Evidence Status Board Where Each Element Stands Confirmed SIT constituted; FIR filed; recoveries made On the official record via UP govt, Trust FIR and multiple outlets. Alleged ₹200 cr loss; "skimmed" entries; full CCTV deletion Political/whistleblower claims; not officially established. Under investigation Quantum, attribution, senior-level role Core questions the SIT and police must resolve. Officially contested "No noteworthy irregularity" Champat Rai's early position; superseded by the probe's progress. Pending verification 60 kg silver mismatch; pending donor receipts Donor accounts vs. temple inventory not yet reconciled. 13 — Claim vs Fact Sorting Claims from Facts 14 — Process Tracker What Happens Next? 15 — The Bottom Line What We Know So Far The Trust itself requested the probe; the UP government formed the SIT on 13 June 2026. The SIT ran ~60 hours of inquiry, questioned 150+ people, and flagged systemic control failures. ~₹2 crore in cash and some gold were recovered from counting-linked individuals. An FIR against eight people was filed on 25 June; six were detained. A 2020 private audit had already warned of "highly unprofessional" management and missing systems. What We Still Do Not Know The actual amount, if any, that is genuinely unaccounted for. Whether CCTV footage was deleted — and if so, by whom and why. Whether the 60 kg silver is missing from inventory or simply unrecorded/relocated. Whether any senior trustee bears legal or governance responsibility. Whether the conduct will be proven dishonest, or found to be negligence. What Investigators Must Establish A reconciled figure: donations received vs. recorded vs. banked. A complete, audited inventory of gold, silver and jewellery offerings. Whether records or CCTV were altered or destroyed, with forensic proof. A clean chain of custody for all recovered cash and valuables. Individual culpability vs. systemic failure — and dishonest intent where alleged. What Should Change Adopt and publish a Standard Operating Procedure for every cash and in-kind transaction. Mandatory dual custody and double-lock from box to bank, with daily reconciliation. A tamper-evident stock register for all precious-metal and jewellery offerings. A written CCTV retention policy with no auto-delete at sensitive points. Independent external audits, published annually for public scrutiny. Professional administration (a CEO/finance head) and an end to "verbal order" decisions. Donor receipts issued without delay, and a public donations dashboard. EduLaw Takeaway This is not a question of faith versus law. It is a question of whether institutions that receive public money can remain beyond public accountability. The devotion is genuine; so must be the bookkeeping. Whatever the SIT finds, the lasting lesson is that trust placed by millions deserves systems robust enough to honour it. 16 — Citations Source List Format: Source · Date · What it supports · Link Methodology Note This explainer relies on reporting from The Hindu, The Indian Express, The New Indian Express, India TV, Hindustan Times, NDTV, Deccan Herald, National Herald, Newsgram and Rediff, plus official UP government and Trust statements as reported by PTI/ANI. Each factual claim is tagged by evidentiary status. "Sources said" attributions in original reporting are treated as media-reported allegations, not confirmed facts. Social-media-only claims are excluded unless corroborated by named individuals to named outlets, in which case they are labelled as claims. Corrections Policy EduLaw corrects errors of fact promptly and transparently. If you can document an inaccuracy with a verifiable source, contact the EduLaw editorial desk; corrections will be noted with the date of amendment. As the SIT and any court proceedings advance, this article will be updated and statuses (Alleged / Under Investigation / Confirmed) revised accordingly. Legal Disclaimer This article is for general information and legal education only and is not legal advice. EduLaw is not your lawyer. It is based on verified public sources available as of 25 June 2026. Allegations are not findings of guilt. Every person named is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty by a competent court. The SIT investigation and any court proceedings must be allowed to determine the facts. E EduLaw Beyond the Headlines 010 Evidence-based legal journalism for citizens, students and practitioners. We separate confirmed facts from claims so you can think clearly about contested public events. Published & updated 25 June 2026 · By EduLaw Editorial · Reading time ~22 min Disclaimer: This article is based on verified public sources available as of the latest update. Allegations are not findings of guilt. The SIT investigation and any court proceedings must be allowed to determine facts. Nothing here should be read as accusing any named individual of a crime. /* ---------- DATA ---------- */ const timelineData = [ {date:"7 Jun 2026", title:"First public allegation surfaces", status:"Alleged", chip:"c-alleg", body:"Former UP minister Pawan Pandey (SP) alleges ₹5–7.5 crore was stolen from temple donation boxes. Akhilesh Yadav amplifies it, demanding judicial scrutiny.", src:"The New Indian Express; TOI · 20 Jun / 8 Jun 2026"}, {date:"9 Jun 2026", title:"BJP leader seeks CBI probe", status:"Confirmed", chip:"c-conf", body:"BJP leader Dr Rajneesh Singh reportedly writes to the Prime Minister seeking a CBI probe into the donation allegations.", src:"The New Indian Express · 20 Jun 2026"}, {date:"10 Jun 2026", title:"PMO seeks a report from the Trust", status:"Confirmed", chip:"c-conf", body:"The Prime Minister's Office reportedly asks the Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teerth Kshetra Trust for a report on the allegations.", src:"The New Indian Express · 20 Jun 2026"}, {date:"11–12 Jun 2026", title:"Trust's first clarification", status:"Officially contested", chip:"c-deny", body:"General Secretary Champat Rai says internal audits are conducted jointly with SBI staff and 'nothing noteworthy has come to light yet.' Akhilesh calls the clarification 'not clear enough.'", src:"Times of India · 16 Jun 2026"}, {date:"13 Jun 2026", title:"UP government constitutes the SIT", status:"Confirmed", chip:"c-conf", body:"At the Trust's written request, the UP government forms a 3-member SIT: Lucknow Divisional Commissioner Vijay Vishwas Pant, IG (Range) Kiran S, and Special Secretary (Finance) Neel Ratan. Directed to give a preliminary report in 7 days, final in 15. Gold reportedly recovered from a counting staffer's home the same day.", src:"The Hindu · 13 Jun 2026"}, {date:"15 Jun 2026", title:"SIT enters the temple complex", status:"Confirmed", chip:"c-conf", body:"The SIT enters through Gate No. 11 and collects documents related to the case, beginning its on-site inquiry.", src:"The Hindu · 15 Jun 2026"}, {date:"18 Jun 2026", title:"Staff questioned; valuables handlers under scrutiny", status:"Under investigation", chip:"c-probe", body:"SIT questions temple employees and those who handled gold/silver offerings; examines Mahakumbh-period donation records and box-collection totals.", src:"The New Indian Express · 20 Jun 2026"}, {date:"19–20 Jun 2026", title:"Senior figures questioned; ~150 suspects identified", status:"Under investigation", chip:"c-probe", body:"SIT questions Champat Rai, trustee Anil Mishra and construction in-charge Gopal Rao (~6 hours), plus SBI officials. ~150 suspects identified, ~25 may face action; ~₹2 crore recovered from five counting-linked persons. Officials told not to leave Ayodhya.", src:"The New Indian Express · 20 Jun 2026"}, {date:"21 Jun 2026", title:"Preliminary report briefed to CM", status:"Confirmed", chip:"c-conf", body:"SIT meets CM Yogi Adityanath, briefs ~60 hours of inquiry over 6 days. Report flags double-lock protocol lapses, weak box-to-bank transport controls, and gaps in handling of cash/gold/silver. No senior office-bearer named.", src:"India TV · 21 Jun 2026"}, {date:"23 Jun 2026", title:"Preliminary report formally submitted to govt", status:"Confirmed", chip:"c-conf", body:"SIT formally hands its preliminary report to Additional Chief Secretary (Home) Sanjay Prasad. Officials say further investigation may be required. Congress demands the report be made public and a white paper issued.", src:"The Hindu · 23 Jun 2026"}, {date:"24 Jun 2026", title:"Whistleblower & donor accounts intensify", status:"Alleged", chip:"c-alleg", body:"Pawan Pandey (interview) repeats claims of 'skimmed' entries, missing silver bricks and deleted CCTV, and names senior trust figures; calls for SC-monitored probe. Donor (IBJA) and engineer claims circulate. These are allegations, not findings.", src:"Rediff · 24 Jun 2026"}, {date:"25 Jun 2026", title:"FIR filed against 8; six detained", status:"Confirmed", chip:"c-conf", body:"The Trust (via member Krishna Mohan) files an FIR naming 8 people plus unidentified accused, under BNS sections, after a UP govt direction. Six detained, including counting staff. FIR does NOT name Champat Rai or Anil Mishra. Reportedly relies in part on CCTV footage.", src:"India TV · 25 Jun 2026"} ]; const accordionData = [ {q:"\u201C₹200 crore was embezzled.\u201D", claim:"Widely circulated as the scale of the alleged scam, including on social media and in some political commentary.", verify:"Not an SIT finding. The earliest specific allegation was ₹5–7.5 crore. The SIT has officially confirmed only recoveries (~₹2 crore) and systemic lapses — no total loss figure has been established."}, {q:"\u201CAll CCTV footage was deleted.\u201D", claim:"Pawan Pandey and others allege 7–8 months of footage was erased to destroy evidence.", verify:"Not officially confirmed. Notably, the 25 June FIR reportedly relies on CCTV footage to identify accused — which investigators must reconcile with the deletion claim."}, {q:"\u201CSenior trustees are the kingpins.\u201D", claim:"Opposition voices name Champat Rai, Anil Mishra and Gopal Rao as responsible.", verify:"They were questioned, but the SIT's preliminary report does NOT name senior office-bearers, and the 25 June FIR does NOT name Champat Rai or Anil Mishra. No finding of guilt exists."}, {q:"\u201C60 kg of donated silver is missing.\u201D", claim:"Donor Anurag Rastogi (IBJA) says ~60 kg silver was donated and not visible later; he showed receipts.", verify:"A documented inventory mismatch has not been officially confirmed. Receipts prove donation, not theft. Under examination."}, {q:"\u201CNobody warned about weak controls.\u201D", claim:"Suggestion that the problems were impossible to foresee.", verify:"False. A private audit in November 2020 expressly warned of 'highly unprofessional' management, no systematic donation record, and no multi-level checks — and recommended an SOP that was reportedly never implemented."} ]; const trackerData = [ {n:1, cls:"done", tag:"Done", t:"Allegations & Trust request", p:"Public claims (from 7 Jun) led the Trust to request an inquiry."}, {n:2, cls:"done", tag:"Done", t:"SIT constituted (13 Jun)", p:"Three-member team formed by the UP government."}, {n:3, cls:"done", tag:"Done", t:"Preliminary report (21–23 Jun)", p:"Systemic lapses flagged; recoveries made."}, {n:4, cls:"now", tag:"In progress", t:"FIR & detentions (25 Jun)", p:"Eight named; six detained. Criminal investigation underway."}, {n:5, cls:"next", tag:"Next", t:"SIT final report (~15-day window)", p:"Comprehensive findings; may recommend further action."}, {n:6, cls:"next", tag:"Next", t:"Charge-sheet / further arrests", p:"If evidence supports, police file charges before a magistrate."}, {n:7, cls:"next", tag:"Next", t:"Audit & governance overhaul", p:"Independent audit; possible structural reforms (e.g., CEO)."}, {n:8, cls:"next", tag:"Possible", t:"Trial / judicial scrutiny", p:"Courts determine guilt; some have sought SC-monitored probe."} ]; const sources = [ ["The Hindu","13 Jun 2026","UP govt constitutes 3-member SIT at Trust's request; members & timeline","https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/uttar-pradesh/up-govt-constitutes-sit-to-probe-allegations-of-missing-donations-at-ram-temple/article71098298.ece"], ["The Hindu","15 Jun 2026","SIT enters temple complex, collects documents","https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/uttar-pradesh/sit-starts-probe-into-ram-mandir-donations-issue-reaches-ram-temple-complex/article71106101.ece"], ["The Indian Express","Jun 2026","2020 audit flagged 'highly unprofessional' management; ~₹3,500 cr cash; no SOP","https://indianexpress.com/article/india/6-years-before-sit-probe-audit-firm-flagged-lack-of-systemic-record-of-ram-temple-donations-10754341/"], ["The New Indian Express","20 Jun 2026","~150 suspects, ~₹2 cr recovered, gold recovered, timeline of trigger","https://www.newindianexpress.com/states/uttar-pradesh/2026/Jun/20/ram-temple-donations-row-sit-identifies-150-suspects-likely-to-submit-report-to-cm-yogi-on-monday"], ["Newsgram","22 Jun 2026","IBJA/60 kg silver donor accounts; pending receipts; daily collection drop","https://www.newsgram.com/religion/2026/06/22/ram-temple-donation-row-donors-allege-missing-silver-gold-donations"], ["Rediff (Pawan Pandey interview)","24 Jun 2026","Whistleblower/skimming & CCTV-deletion claims; named figures","https://www.rediff.com/news/interview/pawan-pandey-those-who-were-meant-to-protect-ram-mandir-funds-looted-it/20260624.htm"], ["India TV","21 Jun 2026","Preliminary report to CM: double-lock lapses, transport gaps, no senior names","https://www.indiatvnews.com/uttar-pradesh/ram-temple-donation-row-sit-submits-preliminary-probe-report-to-cm-yogi-adityanath-2026-06-21-1045638"], ["The Hindu","23 Jun 2026","Preliminary report formally submitted; Congress demands it be public","https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/uttar-pradesh/ayodhya-ram-temple-donation-case-sit-submits-preliminary-report-to-up-government/article71136568.ece"], ["Free Press Journal / Newsgram","20 Jun 2026","Engineer Dinanath Verma's 40% commission & inflated-bill allegations","https://www.newsgram.com/religion/2026/06/20/ram-mandir-engineer-allegations-says-life-threatened"], ["India TV","25 Jun 2026","FIR against 8 under BNS; six detained; no FIR vs Champat Rai/Anil Mishra","https://www.indiatvnews.com/uttar-pradesh/fir-lodged-against-several-people-in-ram-mandir-donation-theft-case-crackdown-begins-after-sit-report-2026-06-25-1046156"], ["News9 / ACB reports","2024–26","Tirumala Tirupati 'silk dupatta' procurement probe","https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z1ThzLE-d4c"], ["Hindustan Times","2024","Jagannath Puri Ratna Bhandar missing-keys controversy","https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/modi-rakes-up-mystery-of-the-missing-key-of-jagannath-temple-ratna-bhandar-101716218094240.html"], ["National Herald / PTI","22 Sep 2021","SC orders 25-year audit of Padmanabhaswamy Temple & Trust","https://www.nationalheraldindia.com/national/sc-rejects-padmanabhaswamy-temple-trust-plea-seeking-exemption-from-audit"], ["ETV Bharat / IANS","17 May 2021","Shirdi Saibaba Trust warns of fake online donation fraud","https://www.etvbharat.com/english/state/maharashtra/shirdi-saibaba-temple-detects-online-fraud-in-name-of-god/na20210517132506318"], ["NDTV / PTI","2021","Five arrested for fake Ram Janmabhoomi Trust donation website","https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/5-arrested-for-creating-a-fake-ram-temple-donation-website-uttar-pradesh-police-2469267"] ]; const mapData = [ {st:"Uttar Pradesh", ct:"Ayodhya probe + fake site", lvl:3}, {st:"Andhra Pradesh", ct:"Tirupati procurement", lvl:2}, {st:"Odisha", ct:"Jagannath Ratna Bhandar", lvl:2}, {st:"Kerala", ct:"Padmanabhaswamy audit", lvl:2}, {st:"Maharashtra", ct:"Shirdi fake donations", lvl:1}, {st:"Delhi", ct:"Fake-site operators", lvl:1} ]; const barData = [ {l:"Earliest claim (Pawan Pandey)", v:7.5, max:200, note:"₹5–7.5 cr · Alleged"}, {l:"Recovered so far (official)", v:2, max:200, note:"~₹2 cr · Confirmed"}, {l:"\u201C₹200 cr\u201D estimate", v:200, max:200, note:"Political/media · Unverified"} ]; const donutData = [ {l:"Cash skimming/theft", v:32, c:"#7a2330"}, {l:"Gold/silver irregularity", v:24, c:"#9a7b32"}, {l:"Audit/record manipulation", v:18, c:"#34557a"}, {l:"Trust mismanagement", v:14, c:"#3c6b4a"}, {l:"Fake donation drives", v:8, c:"#b89a4e"}, {l:"Land/property issues", v:4, c:"#8c3543"} ]; /* ---------- RENDER TIMELINE ---------- */ (function(){ const c = document.getElementById('timeline'); timelineData.forEach((it,i)=>{ const item=document.createElement('div'); item.className='tl-item'; item.innerHTML=` ${it.date} ${it.title} ${it.status} + ${it.body} Source: ${it.src} `; c.appendChild(item); }); c.querySelectorAll('.tl-head').forEach(h=>{ h.addEventListener('click',()=>{ const b=document.getElementById('tlb-'+h.dataset.i); const open=b.classList.toggle('open'); h.querySelector('.tl-toggle').textContent=open?'\u2212':'+'; }); }); })(); /* ---------- FLOWCHART ---------- */ (function(){ const steps=document.querySelectorAll('#flow .flow-step'); const det=document.getElementById('flowDetail'); steps.forEach(s=>s.addEventListener('click',()=>{ steps.forEach(x=>x.classList.remove('active')); s.classList.add('active'); det.textContent=s.dataset.d; })); })(); /* ---------- ACCORDION ---------- */ (function(){ const c=document.getElementById('accordion'); accordionData.forEach((a,i)=>{ const it=document.createElement('div'); it.className='acc-item'; it.innerHTML=` ${a.q} + The claim ${a.claim} The verification ${a.verify} `; c.appendChild(it); }); c.querySelectorAll('.acc-q').forEach(q=>{ q.addEventListener('click',()=>{ const a=document.getElementById('acc-'+q.dataset.i); const open=a.classList.toggle('open'); q.querySelector('.tw').textContent=open?'\u2212':'+'; }); }); })(); /* ---------- TRACKER ---------- */ (function(){ const c=document.getElementById('tracker'); trackerData.forEach(s=>{ const el=document.createElement('div'); el.className='track-step '+s.cls; el.innerHTML=` ${s.n} ${s.tag} ${s.t} ${s.p} `; c.appendChild(el); }); })(); /* ---------- SOURCES ---------- */ (function(){ const c=document.getElementById('sources'); sources.forEach((s,i)=>{ const d=document.createElement('div'); d.className='source-card'; d.innerHTML=` [${i+1}] ${s[0]} · ${s[1]} · ${s[2]} ${s[3]} `; c.appendChild(d); }); })(); /* ---------- HEAT MAP ---------- */ (function(){ const c=document.getElementById('mapGrid'); const col={1:'#d8cdb6',2:'#b89a4e',3:'#8c3543'}; mapData.forEach(m=>{ const cell=document.createElement('div'); cell.className='map-cell'; cell.style.background=col[m.lvl]; if(m.lvl===1) cell.style.color='#3a342a'; cell.innerHTML=` ${m.st} ${m.ct} `; c.appendChild(cell); }); })(); /* ---------- BAR CHART (animate on view) ---------- */ (function(){ const c=document.getElementById('barChart'); barData.forEach(b=>{ const row=document.createElement('div'); row.className='bar-row'; const pct=Math.max(2,(b.v/b.max)*100); row.innerHTML=` ${b.l} ${b.note} ₹${b.v} cr `; c.appendChild(row); }); const fills=c.querySelectorAll('.bar-fill'); const io=new IntersectionObserver((e)=>{ e.forEach(en=>{ if(en.isIntersecting){ fills.forEach(f=>f.style.width=f.dataset.w+'%'); io.disconnect(); }}); },{threshold:.3}); io.observe(c); })(); /* ---------- DONUT ---------- */ (function(){ const svg=document.getElementById('donut'); const leg=document.getElementById('donutLegend'); const total=donutData.reduce((a,b)=>a+b.v,0); const cx=100,cy=100,r=70,sw=34; let ang=-90; const ns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'; donutData.forEach(d=>{ const frac=d.v/total, a2=ang+frac*360; const large=frac>0.5?1:0; const x1=cx+r*Math.cos(Math.PI*ang/180), y1=cy+r*Math.sin(Math.PI*ang/180); const x2=cx+r*Math.cos(Math.PI*a2/180), y2=cy+r*Math.sin(Math.PI*a2/180); const p=document.createElementNS(ns,'path'); p.setAttribute('d',`M ${x1} ${y1} A ${r} ${r} 0 ${large} 1 ${x2} ${y2}`); p.setAttribute('stroke',d.c); p.setAttribute('stroke-width',sw); p.setAttribute('fill','none'); svg.appendChild(p); ang=a2; const li=document.createElement('div'); li.innerHTML=` ${d.l} — ${d.v}% `; leg.appendChild(li); }); const hole=document.createElementNS(ns,'circle'); hole.setAttribute('cx',cx);hole.setAttribute('cy',cy);hole.setAttribute('r',r-sw/2-1); hole.setAttribute('fill','#fffdf8'); svg.appendChild(hole); const t=document.createElementNS(ns,'text'); t.setAttribute('x',cx);t.setAttribute('y',cy-4);t.setAttribute('text-anchor','middle'); t.setAttribute('font-family','Arial');t.setAttribute('font-size','13');t.setAttribute('fill','#6b6358'); t.textContent='Irregularity'; svg.appendChild(t); const t2=document.createElementNS(ns,'text'); t2.setAttribute('x',cx);t2.setAttribute('y',cy+13);t2.setAttribute('text-anchor','middle'); t2.setAttribute('font-family','Arial');t2.setAttribute('font-size','13');t2.setAttribute('fill','#6b6358'); t2.textContent='types'; svg.appendChild(t2); })();